Gwendolyn K. Grewe Summons

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Civil Other/Miscellaneous _________________________________________________________ Gwendolyn K. Grewe, Court File No.: 56-CV-24-1069 Plaintiff, Assigned Judge: ___________ v. Carla L. Wolsky; Sheila Leigh Tungesvick; Tina Marie Rydland; Nya L. Haberman; Estate of Kenwood C. Grewe; and, all unknown persons claiming any right, title, estate, interest, or lien in the real estate described in the complaint herein. Defendants. _________________________________________________________ SUMMONS _________________________________________________________ THIS SUMMONS IS DIRECTED TO ALL DEFENDANTS PERSONALLY IDENTIFIED ABOVE, AS WELL AS ALL UNKNOWN PERSONS AND HEIRS WHO MAY CLAIM AN INTEREST IN THE REAL ESTATE DESCRIBED HEREIN. 1. YOU ARE BEING SUED. The Plaintiff has started a lawsuit against you. The Plaintiff’s Complaint against you is attached to this Summons. Do not throw these papers away. They are official papers that affect your rights. You must respond to this lawsuit even though it may not yet be filed with the Court and there may be no court file number on this Summons. 2. YOU MUST REPLY WITHIN 20 DAYS TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS. You must give or mail to the person who signed this summons a written response called an Answer within 20 days of the date on which you received this Summons. You must send a copy of your Answer to the person who signed this Summons located at: Lakes Area Law Center Robert O. Blatti, Attorney 702 Lake Avenue North P.O. Box 829 Battle Lake, MN 56515 robert.lakeslaw@arvig.net 3. YOU MUST RESPOND TO EACH CLAIM. The Answer is your written response to the Plaintiff’s Complaint. In your Answer you must state whether you agree or disagree with each paragraph of the Complaint. If you believe the Plaintiff should not be given everything asked for in the Complaint, you must say so in your Answer. 4. YOU WILL LOSE YOUR CASE IF YOU DO NOT SEND A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT TO THE PERSON WHO SIGNED THIS SUMMONS. If you do not answer within 20 days, you will lose this case. You will not get to tell your side of the story, and the Court may decide against you and award the Plaintiff everything asked for in the Complaint. If you do not want to contest the claims stated in the Complaint, you do not need to respond. A default judgment can then be entered against you for the relief requested in the Complaint. 5. LEGAL ASSISTANCE. You may wish to get legal help from a lawyer. If you do not have a lawyer, the Court Administrator may have information about places where you can get legal assistance. Even if you cannot get legal help, you must still provide a written Answer to protect your rights or you may lose the case. 6. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The parties may agree to or be ordered to participate in an alternative dispute resolution process under Rule 114 of the Minnesota General Rules of Practice. You must still send your written response to the Complaint even if you expect to use alternative means of resolving this dispute. 7. THIS LAWSUIT MAY AFFECT OR BRING INTO QUESTION TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY located in Otter Tail County, State of Minnesota, and legally described as follows: Commencing at Government meander corner No. 23 on the West line of Section Twenty-three (23), in Township One Hundred Thirty-four (134), of Range Forty (40); thence North 70 degrees 06 minutes East 550.6 feet; thence North 72 degrees 30 minutes East 735 feet; thence North 74 degrees East 600 feet to point of beginning; thence North 16 degrees West 250 feet; thence North 74 degrees East 60 feet; thence South 16 degrees East 250 feet to the shore of Otter Tail Lake; thence South 74 degrees West 60 feet along lakeshore to point of beginning, the above described tract being located in Government Lot Four (4), of Section Twenty-three (23), in Township One Hundred Thirty-four (134) of Range Forty (40) and containing 0.34 acres more or less, also known as Lot Twenty-three (23) of El Dorado Beach, an unrecorded plat The purpose of this action is to ask the Court above to reform a 1994 warranty deed that erroneously names Plaintiff and her now deceased spouse the grantees as tenants in common as opposed to joint tenants with rights of survivorship. The purpose of this action is to ask the Court above to reform a 1994 warranty deed that erroneously names Plaintiff and her now deceased spouse the grantees as tenants in common as opposed to joint tenants with rights of survivorship. LAKES AREA LAW CENTER Dated: May 2, 2024 /s/ Robert O. Blatti Atty. ID No.: 0237267 702 Lake Avenue North P.O. Box 829 Battle Lake, MN 56515 (218) 862-5690 robert.lakeslaw@arvig.net ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF (Published June 5, 12, and 19, 2024) ———————————————————————————————–